Author Topic: Edirol R-09HR  (Read 2771 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lostflower4

  • Curefan Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 2613
  • Karma: 109
    • The Imaginary Lemurs Cure Site
Edirol R-09HR
« on: April 22, 2008, 21:04:31 »
Well, I guess they couldn't leave a good thing alone:

http://www.myr09.com


But I'm really not convinced that it's an upgrade. Until using 16 GB cards become practical, I can't imagine recording at 96 kHz. Also, I have yet to be convinced that sample rates higher than 48K are really beneficial.

I really don't like how they moved the inputs to the side and the hold switch to the back. I also heard about some other things that don't necessarily sound like improvements.


Check out this hilarious Japanese translated description:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=150232619155&ssPageName=STRK:MEWA:IT&ih=005


Automatic rimitting!

:smth043


Offline japanesebaby

  • Curefan Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 4758
  • Karma: 211
Re: Edirol R-09HR
« Reply #1 on: April 22, 2008, 21:19:18 »
Check out is this hilarious Japanese translated description:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=150232619155&ssPageName=STRK:MEWA:IT&ih=005


Automatic rimitting!

:smth043



"The recording time of the recording of a little performance and the record of the conference, etc. is able not to worry in the high compression only of MP3 and to be useless fast."

:smth017 i always thought i knew some english but i guess i was wrong...
:smth023
Ay, in the very temple of Delight
Veil'd Melancholy has her sovran shrine

Offline japanesebaby

  • Curefan Master
  • *****
  • Posts: 4758
  • Karma: 211
Re: Edirol R-09HR
« Reply #2 on: April 22, 2008, 21:24:07 »
and yes, putting the hold switch in the back is a poor idea - easy to get it mixed with some other switches (like low cut). :/
Ay, in the very temple of Delight
Veil'd Melancholy has her sovran shrine